|
| Author |
Message |
Sporkinator
|
Post subject: Re: BZ1 vs BZ2  Posted: June 1st, 2010, 9:39 pm |
|
 |
| senior member |
Joined: June 1st, 2008, 9:16 pm
Posts: 3679
|
|
|
Thanks for posting that Xtreme, you can't argue with reviews.  Yes, 9.4 / 10 = 94% (Battlezone) Grade: A 6.6 / 10 = 66% (Combat Commander) Grade: D In college, a "D" is FAILING, just like an "F", so Combat Commander is a failure and Battlezone is an epic win. If you say: "But they didn't know everything about the game before they wrote the review", yes that is true, but it applies to both games, so it's an even field. Battlezone managed an "A", even with the few things the reviewers disliked about the game, including the AI. If the AI had been just a little bit better, the game could have easily gotten 9.7-9.9 instead of a 9.4. 
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominant
|
Post subject: Re: BZ1 vs BZ2 Posted: June 2nd, 2010, 9:01 pm |
|
Joined: April 14th, 2009, 4:57 pm
Posts: 126
|
|
|
You guys are extremely bias, this topic should of never been posted. Post this topic on a bz2 board it will be exactly the same, or noone will bother posting. I've talked to bz2 players about coming back to this game, the answer is always know. And it's always because the game is apparently 'boring', 'slow' and 'easy'. You guys don't know s***  I'm quite fair, as i like both games, but i still play bz1 more .
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Sporkinator
|
Post subject: Re: BZ1 vs BZ2 Posted: June 2nd, 2010, 10:06 pm |
|
|
| senior member |
Joined: June 1st, 2008, 9:16 pm
Posts: 3679
|
|
|
Mathematical proof is not bias. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Xtreme
|
Post subject: Re: BZ1 vs BZ2 Posted: June 2nd, 2010, 10:13 pm |
|
| dummy |
Joined: July 29th, 2008, 10:40 pm
Posts: 96
|
|
|
Sporkinator wrote: Mathematical proof is not bias. This.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Dominant
|
Post subject: Re: BZ1 vs BZ2 Posted: June 3rd, 2010, 2:47 am |
|
Joined: April 14th, 2009, 4:57 pm
Posts: 126
|
|
|
Snowcone wrote: Not meaning to be rude, but I probably know far more about BZII strat then you ever will, Dominant.
Secondly, BZ II failed for many reasons, the reviews speak for themselves. You can go ahead and babble on about the features in BZII all you want and the endless armies you can make but when it comes down to managing up to 10 units, per type, it takes much more skills as you do not simply have a mindset of "it's okay, I got 3 scrap pools so I can make another one." In BZ, you go "Oh great, -1 tank...I need to go into battle to make more scrap to fill in that slot."
You know nothing of BZ1 strat, in fact I think I saw you in there maybe once since I discovered this site. You can't speak of strategy when you don't play like it in a strat game. Oh sorry for quoting such an old post.. But snowcone, i'd love to know who you are. I'd also love to give you a game sometime.. I very much doubt you know more about bz2 strat than me. Specially when you don't know what my nicknames are on there!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Mr. Spock
|
Post subject: Re: BZ1 vs BZ2 Posted: June 6th, 2010, 12:02 pm |
|
| senior member |
Joined: August 20th, 2007, 12:17 pm
Posts: 3133
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
|
|
|
Dominant, why people like you exist in a BZ world? I haven't seen you in a game for a quiet some time (you are AFK whenever big boys are around), and all you do here is post crappy BZ2 posts. You made them 117 already. Can you (or anyone else) point me to 1 useful post made by you? When I say useful I mean something worth reading twice. Thanks.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Snowcone
|
Post subject: Re: BZ1 vs BZ2 Posted: June 9th, 2010, 8:37 pm |
|
| dummy |
Joined: October 3rd, 2009, 4:20 pm
Posts: 418
Location: TX, GA, DC
|
|
|
Dominant wrote: But snowcone, i'd love to know who you are.
I'd also love to give you a game sometime.. I very much doubt you know more about bz2 strat than me. Specially when you don't know what my nicknames are on there! Lucky for you I just got out of the sandbox today, we'll meet soon. I haven't played BZII in about 2 years, but it isn't something to take forever to polish up on.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
|
